The Marine Amazonia of Europe: Greek Seas, fishing aquaculture and corporate and government corruption
Introduction
Greece is a country which at
present has an economy in crisis. In order that it recovers it will have to
turn to its own natural resources at least to an extent. This off course will
include its seas and coastal areas, which effectively cover more than half the
country and that are a hotspot for global biodiversity but at the same time
under intense and ever increasing pressure from anthropogenic activities and
erroneous government policies. Fishing and aquaculture are at present the most
important activities in terms of ecological impact in this zone yet ecological
sustainability in these sectors is very low in the government and corporate
agenda.
The Greek Seas and coastline
Greek sea and adjacent coastal areas cover more than
half of the country. Greece has the 11th
longest coastline in the world with 13,676 km (8,498 mi); its land boundary is
1,160 km (721 mi). It
is also important to note that the majority of the Greek population inhabits
the coast and the islands.
Greek marine waters harbor an ecosystem that is in one
of the world biodiversity hotspots including coral communities, and species
like the Mediterranean monk seal a critically endangered animal with only 300
individuals left on the planet, being at present more threatened than the African mountain gorilla. At present a variety of economic activities occur. Two
of these are fishing and aquaculture.
Fishing
The fishing sector in Greece is one of the most
important activities both ecologically and economically in coastal and marine
Greece. In 2008 Greece accounted for 19% of the EU's fishing haul in the
Mediterranean Sea, ranked third with 85,493 tons, and ranked first in the
number of fishing vessels in the Mediterranean between European Union members.
Additionally, the country ranked 11th in the EU in total quantity of fish
caught, with 87,461 tons. This figure does not include subsistence and sport
fishing which is a popular activity culturally within Greece and for which only
general figures can be quoted.
At present overfishing and destructive fishing
practices are common with government fiscalization authorities simply
underperforming at their role in general with a consequence of that being the emptying of Greek seas.
Furthermore the favoring of commercial scale trawlers
by the relevant Greek and EU bodies is also catalytic towards
this degradation. This favoring has among other things included the
assisted slow disappearance of subsistence and other traditional forms of
fishing through actions such as the non issuance of new professional fishing
licenses, and the
funded destruction of traditional fishing vessels .These industrial
trawlers also pay a lot less attention to the local ecosystem due to the fact
that they are not usually native to the specific regions that
they fish.
In 2014 a relevant shocking development with respect
to fishing in Greece took place. This was the complete abolishment on all types
of amateur
fishing licenses. This practically means that now anyone can go and fish
provided that if there was a government inspection of their person they would
not have numbers and sizes of species that are prohibited based on relevant
legislation.
The ecological consequences of this legal change are
dire because now the volume of what is caught is essentially set to infinity
for this type of fishing. This is off course ecologically unsustainable.
This would in long term be disastrous considering the fact
that many tourists both from within and outside the country visit the coastal
and marine zones and can potentially go fishing. This does not include other kinds of non recreation fishermen that can
benefit their short term financial income from this.
In addition to this in early 2015 just a few weeks
before the national election new legislation was issued that now allowed a long
banned destructive fishing practice to be carried out for purposes of
scientific investigation that could be issued to any kind of trawler. This was winch fishing. The
assurance was given by the relevant government scientists and authorities that
the practice can be sustainable and it will be carried out for this purpose
only. The European Union (EU) supports this despite a ban existing on this
practice at the EU level claiming that this legislative change will help in
designing a sustainable model for this practice. The
measure is reminiscent of the scientific whaling carried out at present under
the legal protection umbrella of the Japanese government.
As has been shown in other cases worldwide this policy
of giving access at unsustainable levels to natural resources or selective
gifts such as free land in exchange for political favors is equivalent to the access
seen here. The disastrous consequences of this are obvious.
Marine and coastal aquaculture
The question that immediately comes to mind is why the
government and the EU are creating and implementing policies for the
destruction of wild fish stocks and the disappearance of fishing especially
traditional one by local coastal communities other than the obvious short term
political gain resulting from the giving of such privileges.
Perhaps one of the reasons is that the long term is
its replacement with something else which is more controllable but not
necessarily more sustainable.
This is almost certainly industrial corporate driven
aquaculture and it deserves special mention.
At the same
time the Greek seas have been emptying of wild fish and other related marine
animals they have been rapidly filling up with fish farms where populations as
far as biomass is concerned have been practically replacing the wild ones
albeit inside pens. These frequently escape from
inside them to breed with wild members of the same species and lead to genetic
contamination of the latter populations.
It is not surprising therefore that funding for this
has come to an extent by the joint Fisheries and aquaculture division of the
EU. In addition to this funds have come from the Greek government,
recapitalization of the Greek stock exchange following its crash in 2002, loans
from the now bought over former agricultural bank of Greece and private
investors mostly from within
the country. This led to an explosion of new farms and facilities
surrounding the Greek coastline relative to the first established farm area of
1983.
Eventually this advancement led to conflicts with
local communities of the coastline and
relevant nongovernmental and government organizations ranging from city
councils to Environmental protection NGOs resulting in the creation of the
Pan-Hellenic movement of legal entities of areas where aquaculture advancement
hinders the interests of its inhabitants.
In 2011 the Greek prime minister at the time George
Papandreou was asking for a vote of confidence by the Greek parliament. Without this he would have to go to elections at a
national level. During the exact days the procedures for this request where
being made publically in the Greek parliament a new ministerial decree was
being created. Its weight was off course equivalent to any other piece of
legislation.
This piece of legislation was the aquaculture ministerial decree that essentially divided the Greek marine and
terrestrial space according to the desires of the aquaculture industry. This
was turned into detailed legislation in late 2014 making the whole scheme even
stronger legally. Finally after this a new addition to the Greek legislation
was made that allowed any kind of aquaculture facility within any kind of
nature protected area on both land and water. Legal battles with respect to this are ensuing at
present in higher Greek courts.
In these farms occurs the growing of fish that are
being raised on a mixture of wild fish meal from unsustainable fishing practices
and soya that may very well include produce of deforested areas of the Amazon for the latter. These convert only 10% of that to animal protein due
to the fact that they are basically carnivorous. The use of genetic engineering
may very well be happening as the use of biotechnology was admitted openly in
the 2014 court hearing for the relevant ministerial decree before the council
of state.
It is important to note here that farm effluents
filtration and safe disposal systems are nonexistent. This is based on
government and industry backed scientific research that states that for a unit
that can produce sometimes many hundred tones of fish a year all effects
dissipate within 200 m of the center of the fish
pen.
Research from Stanford University USA, indicates that
this is hardly the case probably but rather that it travels many kilometers. For other meat producing plants like poultry a
sophisticated legislative framework exists to prevent effluent discharge in the
sea or in the environment in general in Greece however. This indicates
an unusual affection towards this industry by government, industry and
relevant nongovernmental organizations. This is especially evident in certain
government reports
of scientific research. The welfare of the animals in these appears to be
of no importance.
These farms have been proven to be placed inside the
spawning habitats of wild fish due to the fact that these sites have ideal
conditions for the growth and development of young fish of several species. The
ecological destruction is more apparent than one would originally suspect since
these are actually limited to few hundred square meters. Photos 6 and 7 show
the situation with sardine in the Ionian Sea and the inner Ionian marine
reserve relative to the existing farms at the time relevant work was done.
It has also been proven that Greece is overproducing
several times the amount that is officially declared. There are indications
that the excess product is simply being baptized as from other countries in the
Mediterranean hence further aggravating the environmental degradation
issue.
Politicians and even ministers are often stockholders
in the fish farming industry. In fact the minister of tourism at the time of
the signing of the 2011 ministerial decree was Pavlos Geroulanos one of the Aquaculture
barons of Greece, at least the one that is apparent as the others may have
been stockholders directly or indirectly also. Therefore the conflict of these
with biodiversity protection and sustainable development and social justice is
hardly surprising.
It is not difficult to extrapolate from this that with
the existing legislation and government and EU backing the entirety of Greek
land, aquatic and marine space is at present essentially donated to the
aquaculture industry at least as far as they are concerned.
The Comparison with the Amazon
This situation with Greek seas is reminiscent of
another one on land which is no other than the Amazon basin. Here also rapid
conversion of high biodiversity natural ecosystems and blatant human rights
violation is occurring under the influence of government and other
international policies to areas of agriculture for export with the argument of
the creation of income, jobs, development and the promotion of stability and
security for the nation. It is also similar to the situation with shrimp and
other forms of aquaculture
in SE Asia.
In the struggle for social and environmental justice
that is at present occurring and is expected to intensify as Greece sinks into
financial depression, corruption and debt local people coalitions and relevant
non government organizations can be expected to take the leading role as is so
common in other parts of the world. The most worrying fact but at the same time perhaps hopeful is
that this situation is in the heart of the European Union which at its core is
claiming to promote peace ,equality and prosperity as well as protection of the
environment not only within its borders but also worldwide .Ultimately this is
a situation which will carry consequences for the future of Greece and the
region at least in the short term and a test as to whether the European union
can provide something more than a trade and financial set of agreements and
legal bodies to enforce them.
Photo 1: The growth of
Aquaculture in Greece for the past 30 Years: Diagram based on
UNEP Data
Photo 2: Dying Posidonia Oceanica sea grass resulting from competition
with algae in intensive aquaculture waters. Oxygen depletion as well as direct
competition is responsible for their demise in this case.
Photo 3: Protesting against
aquaculture development in the inner Ionian Archipelago Marine Reserve in the
core of the area in 2013.
Photo 4:The 2011 ministerial
decree map that declares part of the inner Ionian archipelago marine reserve
and part of land as an area for the organized development of aquaculture. With
the 2014 legislation all of the marine reserve and adjacent land is
characterized as well. Map from relevant ministerial decree, legends added on
map by Ted Karfakis
Photo 5: The Kalamos island
pine forest whose entire area was declared as that for the development of
industrial aquaculture. It is in the periphery of the inner Ionian archipelago
marine protected area. Trees several centuries old will have to be cut and
removed to make way if the aquaculture industry decides to do so and an
important habitat for many species and a popular tourist attraction to the area
could be lost
Photo 6:Map showing the
reproductive sites for round Sardinella within the protected area(top) and the
one showing the Natura 200 site(Yellow hatched grid) and the characterization
of the area for industrial aquaculture superimposed(red hatched grid)
Map of sardine reproductive sites from
:SOMARAKIS, S., GANIAS, K., SIAPATIS, A., KOUTSIKOPOULOS, C., MACHIAS, A. and
PAPACONSTANTINOU, C. (2006), Spawning habitat and daily egg production of
sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in the eastern Mediterranean. Fisheries
Oceanography, 15: 281–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00387.x
Photo 7: The different fish
farms already present in the region along with registered production capacity. This
may be seriously underestimated as units have been reported to overproduce what
they are registered for ,ignoring relevant environmental legislation from Ecological mapping and data quality
assessment for the needs of ecosystem-based marine spatial management: case
study Greek Ionian Sea and the adjacent gulfs (Medit. Mar. Sci., 13/2, 2012,
297-311)
Comments
Post a Comment
Send us your comments .Offensive, threatening or irellevant comments will not be granted permission